Showing posts with label Romans. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Romans. Show all posts

Thursday, 18 August 2016

Don't put Happiness on Hold

I'm rereading my new favorite book series (at least until I reread Harry Potter, probably) and it's just as much fun as the first time through. I rushed my first reading, I think because I wanted to see what was going to happen with the (very understated but awesome) love story. I admit that mattered more to me than the other huge happenings that affected more characters and defined the main plotline. Not that that says a lot about me or anything.

My second readthrough is also amazing, but it's different. I'm struck by plenty of foreshadowing and details I missed the first time through. Things I didn't think mattered at all became super important in light of the eventual conclusion. There were clues sprinkled all throughout the books that I didn't have the proper perspective or patience to pick up on before. I was too distracted by pressing ahead to see how things would turn out.

Knowing the ending doesn't make me appreciate the story less; it gives me hope for the hard times. When something terrible happens, I can tell myself, "it's all gonna be okay." I can enjoy the time I have with the characters, knowing some of them die. I can appreciate the richness of a friendship before betrayal enters the picture. I know good wins, even when all seems to be lost.

I liken my first readthrough to my natural (fleshly, in Christianese) inclination to live quickly and impatiently rush through boredom to juicier things; in other words, how I've lived most of my life. In this mindset, waiting to get what I want seems a mistake: something to be endured, not enjoyed. My second readthrough more resembles living with a redeemed mind and eternity in view. This unhurried state is relatively new to me and feels a million times better.

Though many of my hopes for my life have yet to materialize, I've realized I don't have to wait to be thankful, and I don't have to get upset when the road seems to turn the opposite direction. It's as simple as imagining how I hope to feel when my dreams come true and allowing myself to feel that right now, no strings attached. Why should I put my excitement on hold? It could be years... time wasted or dissipated into other emotions besides gratitude, excitement and joy. I see no reason to wait. If my dreams do not come to pass, then I've at least lived several extra years with positive emotion. And this isn't just wishful thinking or fantasy; as a child of God, called according to His purposes, I know for sure something good is coming for me.

I think this is what Paul meant when he wrote that "we boast in the hope of the glory of God. Not only so, but we also glory in our sufferings, because we know that suffering produces perseverance; perseverance, character; and character, hope. And hope does not put us to shame," (Romans 5:2b-5a) I think boredom or waiting can be considered a form of suffering, but we can still be totally okay with them, knowing what's coming. And I think the last verse means we won't regret hope or be embarrassed we hoped, both because God's promises are true and Jesus is actually coming back and because hoping is an honorable and positive thing, whether or not life turns out the way we expected it to.

As a sidebar, I also find that trusting my path is headed for good releases me from feeling envious of my friends (most of the time!). I can honestly celebrate with those who celebrate, seeing each success story as proof that success keeps coming for us all one by one, rather than thinking there's a success pie that's shrinking as it's served up and if I don't get my slice soon I'll starve.

In my head I've been calling this mindset "preemptive gratitude," though "faith" and "trust" would both work well. The Bible calls it hope a few times. Romans 8:24b-25 says that "hope that is seen is no hope at all. Who hopes for what they already have? But if we hope for what we do not yet have, we wait for it patiently." Hope is good (duh), but it's not possible to hope for what we have. Earthly life is our one chance to love God by trusting Him and believing in His promises even though we can't yet see the outcome. When our earthly lives are through, our faith (our hope) will be turned to sight. Living in a world that's still broken provides our only chance at hope. And by the way, what is more majestic: a light shining in broad daylight or a light that shines in darkness?

Christ-followers know good wins in the end. This is why celebration and dancing and feasting are all appropriate even in this world full of crime and hate and poverty, why we say of God, "You prepare a table before me in the presence of my enemies." (Psalm 23:5a) This verse closely relates to enjoying and savoring my book because I know for sure that the very real and dangerous threats from the enemy won't derail the ultimate mission. Joy isn't insensitive or thoughtless; it's acknowledging a deeper truth. We're all free to ease up on the breakneck pace and enter fully into our lives, secure in a good ending. We can delight in each twist and turn of the story without rushing or despairing. We can celebrate the happy ending right now and let it inform all our choices until it gets here. We don't have to wait to be glad it all turns out well: we can celebrate that truth today, in whatever city and life station we presently find ourselves.

"Let us hold unswervingly to the hope we profess, for he who promised is faithful." (Hebrews 10:23) Let's enjoy the benefits of hope now, despite obstacles, because we can, and because the author of the story of humanity and the world is trustworthy and has promised us a good ending.

Thursday, 28 April 2016

The Gospel in the Fault in Our Stars

I just read The Fault in Our Stars for the first time. I haven't seen the movie. The story's been hyped-up; my expectations were extremely high from over a year of positive media attention. Though it contains more beautifully-written passages than a typical YA novel, this book did not make me emote. I didn't have many strong feelings while reading it, and I didn't shed any tears, even though I feel things almost constantly, cry somewhat often in general, and the main thing I knew about it going in is that this book is supposed to break your heart and make you weep. So why didn't I cry? I decided it was because I cannot really relate to Hazel, the narrator. Her view on the world seems pretty diametrically opposed to mine. I wonder if 16-year-old me would have appreciated her extreme cynicism more. I'm sure I would've, since at that time I was being steeped in worldly ideas about sex and relationships, two relevant areas that I find little common ground with Hazel.

Throughout the book, Hazel makes much of the fact that believing in God is super stupid. She mocks religion, Christianity, encouragement, hope, and the Christian leader of her support group, who she thinks is sad and pathetic. But then when her own beliefs are revealed, they contradict her cynicism. First, she calls her father "fairly smart" when he says, "I believe the universe wants to be noticed. I think the universe is improbably biased toward consciousness, that it rewards intelligence in part because the universe enjoys its elegance being observed. And who am I, living in the middle of history, to tell the universe that it--or my observation of it--is temporary?"

Later, Hazel says, "I was thinking about the universe wanting to be noticed, and how I had to notice it as best I could. I felt that I owed a debt to the universe that only my attention could repay, and also that I owed a debt to everybody who didn't get to be a person anymore and everyone who hadn't gotten to be a person yet."

This is about the best secular retelling of the Gospel I've ever heard. I realize that's a total oxymoron. The Gospel cannot be inferred (that's why we have the Bible--to put the necessary words to the story), but God's existence can be, if someone is open-minded as they observe nature and the large questions in the heart of humanity. "Owing a debt of attention to the universe" skips some crucial steps in the truth, but broadly speaking, there's overlap. Hazel's theory includes these aspects of the Gospel:

1. We are not self-made; we can and should give back and give forward.
2. Our value and our salvation are not in the work of our hands, not in what we can produce or bring about externally.
3. The path to bridging an unbridgeable gap of debt between ourselves and eternity begins with a mental shift and putting our attention in the right place.
4. There is a higher personal force out there that wants something from us; only persons "want," "reward," and "enjoy."

These two Bible verses (from the NIV) illustrate some of the overlap: "However, to the one who does not work but trusts God who justifies the ungodly, their faith is credited as righteousness." (Romans 4:5). The word "credit" directly ties in with Hazel's term "debt." Attention is much more like trust and faith than it is like work. In a similar fashion, Jesus said, "The work of God is this: to believe in the one he has sent." (John 6:29) Keeping our eyes on Jesus (paying attention to Him) is the alpha and omega of living as a believer. Not paying attention to Jesus is the only sure way to avoid having our debt repaid. Jesus, in whom all things hold together (Colossians 1:17), which kind of sounds like the way a non-believer would understand the universe, which has its etymological origin in the Latin word for "all things."

Hazel's mention of owing a debt to other people, those who have gone before and those to come, sounds like the communion of saints, as well as Biblical commands to love one's neighbors. Romans 13:8 (NIV) explicitly uses the word "debt," saying "Let no debt remain outstanding, except the continuing debt to love one another, for whoever loves others has fulfilled the law." I think Hazel would agree that remembering someone who has died is an act of love toward that person. And I think she's saying that living well for the sake of those who cannot is an act of love, too. What other way would there be to pay a debt owed to both the dead and the not-yet alive?

To say the universe enjoys its elegance being observed reminds me of our call to praise God continually for who He is, which is partly seen through all His works, like nature and our elegant universe, not to mention humanity and the beauty of the human spirit. To say God wants to be noticed by us is an understatement. He wants and deserves to be outright worshiped. But the seed of the truth is present in Hazel's dad's comments.

When Hazel's dad asks, "Who am I... to tell the universe?" I completely agree. There's so much arrogance built in to a worldview that categorically denies higher intelligence than humans. Until we've lived forever and seen it all (and even the most staunch atheist/humanist in their right mind would not claim humans have always existed), let's not make statements as though we have the ability to know we're the smartest beings in the universe. Yuck, I feel gross just considering that. Humans can be very intelligent, yes, and wonderful at times, but who would even want to live in a universe where we, greedy, self-centered, short-sighted, lazy, irritable, forgetful, close to electing Donald Trump as the ruler of the free world, are the highest form of all existence?

In conclusion, I'm not sure what the author was going for. Maybe he realizes all this and it was intentional. I was simply struck by the incongruity between what Hazel openly scorns and what she seems to believe deep down, an incongruity of which she seems perfectly unaware.